Overpriced and practically the same as previous Callaway clubs, with one important difference… the paint job. This honest review is over.
Thanks for reading and please come back next week for an honest review of the TaylorMade M184 clubs. Spoiler alert: they are also overpriced and the same as previous models but with a HUGE design change regarding the color scheme of the paint.
Nah, just kidding. We can talk about the Callaway Mavrik clubs a little. Let’s begin.
DRIVERS
To keep it simple, one’s for good golfers (Sub Zero), one’s for crap golfers (standard Mavrik), and one’s for golfers that truly couldn’t be worse if they tried (Mavrik Max). A little generalistic, but not much.
Here at golfclubguru, we hate getting technical. We’ll leave the gimmicky mumbo jumbo for the club manufacturers website. We like to keep it real here. Let’s break down the three drivers.
Callaway Mavrik Sub Zero Driver Review
The Callaway Mavrik Sub Zero driver is all about low spin for higher swing speeds. Drivers can get a little spinny for fast swinging golfers, which takes away from the total distance that they can drive the ball. However, it’s worth noting that the club head is just one of MANY factors that impact spin. Other factors include your swing (specifically your angle of attach), swing speed, your shaft, and your golf ball. We’d recommend a simple professional fitting if you plan on taking golf seriously in any sense of the term.
The salesman over at Callaway also praise the high MOI (moment of inertia) design of the driver, which is rare in a club head that’s marketed as “low spin”. We don’t buy into the high MOI very much, as that term is far overused. In simple terms, it’s just the amount of energy needed to rotate the club face on an off center hit. A “high” MOI design will require lots of energy to twist the club face. However, this driver is really meant for fast, low handicap golfers that shouldn’t miss the club face often anyway, if at all.
Personally, unless you have been fitted specifically for the Mavrik Sub Zero and a good shaft combination, you probably shouldn’t be getting the Sub Zero driver.
Callaway Mavrik Driver Review
Although this will probably be the most popular Mavrik model sold in 2020, you should probably consider the Max unless you consistently hit a majority of fairways. Will it hurt your ego a little? Maybe, but that sounds like a personal problem. I’ll tell you WITH CERTAINTY that a more forgiving driver will improve your game more than a driver that might increase your average drive by .5 yards.
Callaway Mavrik MAX Driver Review
Step one will be a lot easier if you have the most forgiving driver on the market for 2020. The Max has a slightly larger club face and sweet spot. That alone will help the majority of golfers that simply struggle to hit the center of the club face consistently.
The Callaway Mavrik Max is also a good choice if you’re struggling with slicing, as it has a removable weight near the heel of the club. You simply add weight to the heel – this will require less hand action to close the fact at impact. We NEVER recommend buying a club to fix a swing problem, but we’re aware that lots of golfers do it. Plus, it can help you along the way during your swing fix.
FAIRWAY WOODS
Mavrik Sub Zero Fairway Wood: Just like with the driver, the sub zero has a smaller profile head and is best for fast swing speeds that generate a lot of spin. It’s got interchangeable weights on the sole of the club, which allows you to adjust launch and spin rate.
Standard Mavrik Fairway Wood: Meant for distance. A little forgiving, but not as much as the Max. If you are the kind of golfer that brags when they fly the green by 10 yards, this club is probably for you.
Mavrik Max Fairway Wood: The most forgiving fairway wood of 2020. If you aren’t comfortable with your ability to hit the center of the club face on a consistent basis, this is the one you should go with. Again, drop your ego and focus on getting clubs that will actually improve your scores, and therefore lead to more fun.
HYBRIDS
If you really hate money and want to shell out $250 for a single hybrid, by all means check out the three different options of Mavrik Hybrids. If you kinda like money (but still want an awesome hybrid), I’d recommend checking out some hybrids that are 2-5 years old in like new condition for a fraction of the price.
We find that people really enjoy pictures more than reading, so just see the above picture if you want a quick comparison of the three different models.
IRON SETS
Until then, we’ll give it our best shot to help you pick the best set for you.
Callaway Mavrik Pro Irons 2020
- Pros: Easy to work the ball (if you like that), great feel at impact, better distance control, cleaner look at address
- Cons: Less forgiving, easy to work the ball (not good if you already slice or hook the ball)
Callaway Mavrik Irons
Sure, it has all of the gimmicky featured of the other Mavrik irons, like the club face made with artificial intellgence. No one cares about that they. They just want to know about how many yards they are going to gain from their previous irons. To really tell, I’d recommend getting on a launch monitor somewhere (at your local club fitter or at a large golf equipment store. Make SURE that you bring your old irons to compare to the Mavrik irons. Why? Because many (actually most) launch monitors boost their numbers to make you really excited and want the buy the clubs instantly without considering other, more budget-friendly options.
- Pros: Extremely long, decently forgiving, typically pretty straight shots as it’s difficult to work the ball
- Cons: A little chunky, not great distance control, hard to work the ball when needed
Callaway Mavrik Max Irons
The result is a club that launches the ball in the air as easily and as quickly as possible. It’s perfect for those that have trouble getting the ball in the air, whether it’s due to angle of impact or swing speed.
The truth is that most golfers simply don’t practice enough and aren’t naturally talented enough to hit the center of the club face reliably. Thankfully, the Max set has a much larger sweet spot, allowing you to miss the center of the club face by up to 1 inch without being punished too badly.
- Pros: Extremely forgiving, decently long, bias for straight shots
- Cons: super chunky (not attractive at address) and hard to work the ball when needed
I’m 79 years old. My driver is the Big Bertha Fusion, think it came out in 2016!
Generally I only walk 9 holes and usually drive in the fairway
Question- will Mavrik make any difference? Robert
Terrible review, littered with spelling errors and grammatical mistakes. Angle of ‘attach’? Please.